data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7c19/f7c192cb69cdb27d07988a5abc5a4fbe41e1b370" alt="Mx300 1tb diskmark"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6f68/e6f68a0c7439f5042c15d106ee111482f613f885" alt="mx300 1tb diskmark mx300 1tb diskmark"
Our next benchmark is the web-server profile,which is read-only, with transfer sizes ranging from 512 bytes to 512KB.
MX300 1TB DISKMARK PRO
In the sequential write benchmark the MX300 SSD was slower than the MX200: At the time of testing, the Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M. The Crucial MX300 was the fastest drive in our database benchmark with 44,936 IOPS in the terminalslightly above the Samsung 850 EVO 2TB, which posted a range of 9,405 IOPS to 43,203 IOPS. Testing will include transfer to and transferring from the devices, using MS RichCopy and logging the performance of the drive. The MX300 ranks somewhere in the middle of the chart in terms of sequential read speed, and we would also like to see a better 4K random read performance, although the latter was significantly improved in 4K Q32 reads: To help replicate worse case scenarios we will transfer a 30.00GB contiguous file, then a folder containing 1200 subfolders with a total 36,000 files varying in length from 200mb to 100kb (15.00 GB total). The charts you see below are based on the data coming from CrystalDiskMark v3.0.4. Fawn Creek Civil Rights Lawyers represent clients who have been illegally discriminated against on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability and national origin. Sequential Q32T1 read/ write speeds were 535 MB/s and 513.7 MB/s, respectively. The latest version of the CrystalDiskMark utility returned performance figures close to those quoted by Crucial. The results did not change much when we ran the test again set to 0Fill mode:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/469e9/469e93f71276277a2b234c5e0a31a7e69bb4fb1f" alt="mx300 1tb diskmark mx300 1tb diskmark"
The Random 4K performance on the drive was 28.13 MB/s read and 134 MB/s write. The MX300 750GB drive reached 448 MB/s read and 444MB/s write in the standard sequential write test. We start with the older version of the CrystalDiskMark, in order to compare the MX300's performance with other SSDs we have tested so far. Entrust your files to a drive that lasts With an endurance rating of up to 220TB total bytes written, the Crucial MX300 is engineered with Micron 3D NAND to deliver years of fast performance.
MX300 1TB DISKMARK SOFTWARE
The software provides throughput data based on sequential reads and writes, and random (512K/4K/4KQD32) reads and writes of various sizes. The Crucial MX300 extends your laptop's battery life by using only 0.075W of power, compared to a typical hard drive which uses 6.8W. The next benchmark is the CrystalDiskMark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7c19/f7c192cb69cdb27d07988a5abc5a4fbe41e1b370" alt="Mx300 1tb diskmark"